Keep the original record.
Preserve what was supplied and record where each item came from. Build a package that can be checked for later changes.
Software demonstration · For counsel & family offices
A threat arrives. A payment is disputed. A private recording surfaces. SUBROSA helps your team organize the evidence, check the record, and prepare a clear brief before the next costly decision.
Open-source software for professional review, designed to run locally. The online demonstration uses synthetic records. See where it helps ↓
Tooling, not a new forensic-response service. SUBROSA is a software demonstration and review workbench. Evidence acquisition, incident response and legal representation are not offered through this page. Any professional engagement requires an agreed scope and confirmed capacity.
In plain English
Think of it as an organized case binder, a record checker, and a second set of eyes—on a machine your team controls.
When the stakes get personal
High-profile clients need counsel who can explain the record and the next step. Start with a familiar situation, not a tour of the technology.
A private threat. A public reputation. A decision that cannot be taken back.
Preserved messages, recoverable fragments in supported database records, and supplied media-analysis findings.
What the review producesA timeline, traceable citations, competing explanations, and questions for independent forensic examination.
The next decisionWhat needs authenticating before responding, paying, or making an allegation?
Explore the synthetic VIP case ↗Conflicting accounts. Scattered approvals. An urgent need to establish the sequence.
The supplied approvals, payment dates and later conflicting report, each linked to its source.
What the review producesAn organized chronology and draft bank-review and preservation documents for counsel to adapt.
The next decisionWho had authority, what do the originals establish, and what should the bank be asked to review?
See the synthetic $5,000 wire example ↗An unchecked wire. Missing payment terms. A matter quietly running over budget.
Agreement terms, recorded staff mistakes, proposed actions, operational alerts and budget assumptions.
What the review producesReview flags, precedent-based checklists and a view of how unexpected costs could change the remaining budget.
The next decisionWhat should be checked or corrected before the team proceeds?
Try the operational examples ↗Illustrative scenarios, not client stories. The working demo uses synthetic records and does not establish anyone’s liability.
A simple path through a difficult file
Your team supplies the records. The system organizes the review. Counsel decides what the evidence means.
Preserve what was supplied and record where each item came from. Build a package that can be checked for later changes.
Look at what supports each explanation, what contradicts it, and which missing facts could change the picture.
Bring a readable summary, source references and review drafts to the conversation about what to verify or do next.
The practical value: less time reconstructing the file; more of the first meeting focused on the next decision.
A work product you can review
The software can generate a practical review package. Read the summary, inspect the supporting records, and give the audit file to another examiner.
Useful between emergencies, too
The same discipline helps your team catch preventable problems in day-to-day operations.
Spot missing payment backing, unclear approval authority, one-sided terms and incomplete remedies for counsel’s review.
Turn recorded errors into warnings and practical checklists when similar actions are proposed.
Flag unusual activity and broken operational rules so a responsible person can investigate.
Explore how changing costs and unexpected expenses could affect the budget before committing more resources.
An examiner can inspect the work
The public sample includes an offline review kit and a claim-by-claim viewer. Every claim begins as not reviewed. Independent human review has not been performed, and accuracy on real matters is unmeasured.
Private by deployment. Clear about the limits.
The core can run without an internet connection on an appropriately isolated machine. The public demonstration contains synthetic data. It is a showcase, not an intake channel for client records.
Source references and signed audit records help another examiner check the supplied material and detect changes.
Records still require authentication. Analysis depends on inputs and assumptions. Signatures do not establish source truth, privilege, legal authority or admissibility.
Start with one scenario
Explore the demonstration, then discuss a private walkthrough with Joey Victorino.
Related practice: Private AI Custody Review examines a local or private AI deployment, its permissions, provenance and audit records. A software walkthrough does not establish privilege, legal authority or a client result.